Brendan Carr, a commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), said the social media app TikTok should be banned in the U.S. The Council on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) has spent months negotiating with TikTok to determine if it can be divested by its Chinese parent company ByteDance creating bleak outlooks and the possibility of a ban.
The main concern is the security of U.S. citizens. TikTok collects data on all of its users.
“No one is storing the nuclear secrets launch codes on Tik Tok, don’t get me wrong. But our behavior patterns, our interests, what we like and don’t like and how we watch consuming media. That’s a goldmine of information,” Tim Weninger, affiliated faculty of the Notre Dame Technology Ethics Center, said.
Director of the Tech Ethics Center Kirsten Martin said other tech giants collect similar data but don’t receive the same amount of scrutiny as TikTok.
“The thing that’s odd that there’s such a fixation on TikTok is that that same type of data is available for foreign governments to take advantage of on Instagram or Facebook,” Martin said.
Martin added that the issue goes well beyond TikTok and fundamentally lies in the current state of ad delivery systems.
“They can still get access to it because Facebook or Instagram or whatever, any social networks, will give them access by selling access to us, based on what our preferences and concerns are, who we’re friends with, where we spend our time, where we are, you know, all that kind of stuff,” she said. “I agree with the general concern. It’s just that it seems to be a misplaced concern on TikTok, when it’s a more general problem with the way the ad delivery systems work.”
Current attitudes toward China divert Americans’ attention to TikTok when it comes to the issue of data collection, Weninger said.
“The reason that we’re interested in it is not because it’s got fake news and stuff, I mean it does, but it’s because it’s owned by China, a Chinese company, and we’re deathly afraid that we’re sending a lot of data about our behaviors and activities and our interests, all the social media things to the Chinese,” Weninger said.
Martin said significant regulations on collecting data through social media are yet to come in part because it benefits political campaigns.
“That’s one of the reasons why they don’t want to stop hyper-targeting, these political operatives use them all the time. And so it’s not a mistake that they haven’t stopped the collection and use of our data. It’s because it’s so useful when trying to micro-target for political reasons,” Martin said.
Because a large portion of young voters on TikTok tend to vote Democrat, Weninger said the Biden administration would be hesitant to consider banning the app.
“So it will be Joe Biden doing this, it will be kicking off a bunch of 25 to 30 year olds who are on Tik Tok. I don’t know if politically that’s something that he wants to touch,” Weninger said.
Within this age of technology, some find it hard to believe that this would be feasible. They may be able to ban the app, but they will not be able to keep people off of it. Many kids nowadays understand how VPNs work and that they can mess with their locations to have access to technology, movies and television shows that are not available in a certain country.
Martin said she doubts completely banning the app in the U.S. is feasible. Virtual private networks (VPNs) allow users to appear as though they’re accessing the Internet from a different location.
“I can’t imagine anyone successfully banning a social network site from 14 to 24-year-olds,” Martin said. “I just think the technical ability of a 14-year-old to watch a movie pretending that they’re in Germany on a VPN is pretty good.”
Weninger said going to the lengths of setting up a VPN would discourage lots of users from browsing the app.
“Why is TikTok so popular? Because it’s easy and it doesn’t take a whole lot of effort. Imagine trying to set up a VPN so you can browse this thing which takes no effort. I just don’t see it happening,” he said.
The federal government needs to attempt to regulate the app before it resorts to banning it, Weninger said. Allowing the government to ban an app like TikTok would set a dangerous precedent, he fears.
“If the executive branch can just ban a site that hasn’t violated any laws, that’s a problem,” Weninger said. “It makes me a little scared because then what prevents the government from banning you know, some site that maybe you rely upon that’s maybe not bad.”
Contact Emma Duffy at eduffy5@nd.edu.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
P.O. Box 779, Notre Dame, IN 46556
024 South Dining Hall, Notre Dame, IN46556
Reach us at (574) 631-7471.
The Observer is the independent newspaper serving Notre Dame, Saint Mary’s and Holy Cross.
We have been publishing since 1966.
Our motto is “To uncover the truth, and report it accurately.”
The Observer accepts advertisements Monday to Friday. Email advertising@ndsmcobserver.com for rate information.
There are many ways to get involved with The Observer: as a writer, designer, photographer or videographer. To learn about how your talents may best serve The Observer, email editor@ndsmcobserver.com.
Email editor@ndsmcobserver.com or call (574) 631-7471 with any questions or concerns.
Viewpoint space is available to all readers. The free expression of all opinions through letters is encouraged. Letters must be signed and must include contact information. We make our best effort to publish all letters that we receive. We ask that you keep letters to a reasonable length.
You must email letters directly to the Viewpoint editor at viewpoint@ndsmcobserver.com. Any published letters or columns are subject to Observer editing policies and copyright. Said material may not be removed/redacted from our platform unless there are factual inaccuracies, in which case the error will subsequently be corrected and the remaining article left unchanged.
Submitting any Letter is subject to the full Viewpoint policy posted below. Please ensure that you have read and fully understand the entirety of the policy.
Anyone is welcome to submit Letters to the Editor, guest columns, quotes, cartoons, comic strips and poems to the Viewpoint Department of The Observer. Items submitted by members of the Notre Dame, Saint Mary’s and Holy Cross community will be given preference for publication.
The opinions expressed in the Viewpoint section are not necessarily those of The Observer. Columns, Letters to the Editor, poems, comic strips, cartoons and quotes are commentaries.
Unsigned editorials represent the opinion of the majority of the Editor-in-Chief, the Managing Editor, Assistant Managing Editors and Department Editors.
All commentaries submitted to The Observer must include the name and phone number or email of the author, as well as class and graduation year if applicable. Letters to the Editor may not exceed 750 words, and columns may not exceed 900 words, though exceptions are made at the discretion of the Viewpoint Editor. The Viewpoint Editor may shorten any Letter or column regardless of length or deem it worthy of print in its entirety.
The Observer does not print anonymous Letters to the Editor, columns, comic strips, cartoons, quotes or poems. A majority of the Editorial Board may override this provision if the submission is irreplaceably relevant and the author has a legitimate reason for anonymity.
All material submitted to the Viewpoint Department, including columns, poems, Letters to the Editor, comic strips and cartoons, becomes property of The Observer. Any further use of these commentaries without the written consent of The Observer is prohibited.
The Observer does not publish material, including columns, poems, Letters to the Editor, comic strips and cartoons, that have already been published elsewhere. This includes other news media sites, blogs and social media platforms.
Not-for-profit organizations, those organizations which have a reciprocal usage agreement and those organizations of which The Observer is a member may be granted permission to publish commentaries with the permission of the Editor-in-Chief or the permission of the Managing Editor and the Viewpoint Editor.
In exceptions, the author of the previously printed material must give legal, written consent or work from organizations of which The Observer is a member. Syndicated columns are excluded from this procedure.
The Viewpoint Department reserves the right to edit all commentaries. The Observer is committed to fostering civil discourse and has no obligation to print submitted commentaries. Such works will not be printed if they are libelous, unintelligible, irrelevant, obscene or contain ad hominem statements regarding private figures. The Observer will not publish commentaries deemed uncivil at the discretion of the editors. All commentaries will be read by at least the Viewpoint Editor, nightly Viewpoint Editor and the nightly Managing Editor.
All facts that require citation must be cited in the submitted material. Submissions must include primary sources that contributed to an author’s argument. The Observer editors reserve the right to reject any given source if it is not primary source material, although exceptions may be made at the discretion of the editors.
Commentaries submitted as Letters to the Editor may not exceed three in number from the same individual or organization within the same academic semester. There is no limit to the number of times an individual or organization may have their commentaries appear in print as columnists.
All commentaries printed in the Viewpoint section must be fact-checked before publication. It is not guaranteed that authors of columns, Letters to the Editor, quotes, comic strips, cartoons and poems will be notified before their work is printed in The Observer.
Only those individuals authorized to speak as representatives for a group will be allowed to use the organization’s name. In such cases, the primary author(s) of the commentary is (are) the individual(s), and the commentary is, in effect, co-signed by the organization.
Paid employees of The Observer are not permitted to have their commentaries appear in the Viewpoint section as Letters to the Editor. Regular columnists and members of the Viewpoint staff are also not eligible to have their commentaries appear in the Viewpoint section as Letters to the Editor. The status of such individuals is determined by the Viewpoint Editor.
Viewpoint columnist applicants must fill out and submit the Viewpoint Columnist application to the Viewpoint Editor. Columnists are hired at the discretion of the Viewpoint Editor. Hiring is done before each school semester begins and at the discretion of the Viewpoint Editor.
The Observer reserves the right to remove comments on The Observer’s website if the editors deem them offensive, lewd, obscene or in poor taste in any fashion. The Observer also reserves the right to ban accounts or disable comments on some or all of the website content in reaction to an abuse of the comment function.
Cartoons and comic strips are considered part of the Viewpoint section although they appear in the Classifieds section. Cartoons and comic strips will be approved by the Viewpoint Editor and the nightly Managing Editor. The editors reserve the right to refuse to run any cartoon or comic strip that the editors deem offensive, discriminatory or hateful at the discretion of the editors.
The views expressed in all commentaries published in The Observer Viewpoint section are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.
The Editorial Board has the authority and discretion to apply and amend this policy as a majority of its members see fit.
Any questions or concerns regarding The Observer Viewpoint policies should be directed to the Viewpoint Editor at viewpoint@ndsmcobserver.com.
Updated: August 29, 2021
© 2022 The Observer
Powered by WordPress